How can products that cause sickness and death be a “smart” idea for the consumer? Why do people buy these devices? Because they have not been told the truth! They believe that the technology is safe, because advertisers and the “authorities” have told them so. What if these advertisers and authorities are lying for a paycheck? What if one of the greatest evils to face mankind has been portrayed as being good so that a relative handful of greedy, wicked people can reap billions of dollars of profit? If this is true, we have a huge problem on planet earth, one that must be dealt with on some level by everyone who has a mind to understand, values the truth and desires to live.
The dangers of electromagnetic fields in general have been known since the early 1930s during a push to electrify rural America. Every time the power lines went up people began getting cancer, and though statistics of this phenomenon were compiled, they were soon stuffed away in dusty file cabinets and all but forgotten so that the utility companies could forge ahead unimpeded by regulation. Studies have long proven that people who lived within a quarter mile of radio and/or television transmission towers were far more likely to get cancer than those who lived further away, but this did not stop the erection of such towers near residential neighborhoods. Medical statistics gathered from residents living within the shadow of San Francisco’s Sutro Tower, for example, prove that the closer and longer one lives to a broadcast antenna, the higher the likelihood that they will develop cancer. |
The Sutro Tower in San Francisco was the subject of early studies on the effects of electro-magnetic radiation.
|
Former FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler's
pivotal speech on 5G |
First generation wireless was voice. Second generation wireless, 2G, allowed both talk and text. Third generation, 3G, the Internet, in a limited way, and today’s Internet, 4G, completed that digital migration … If anyone tells you the details of what 5G is going to become, run the other way… Yes, 5G will connect the internet of everything. If something can be connected it will be connected … hundreds of billions of microchips connected in products from pill bottles to plant water, requiring massive deployment of small cells. We won’t wait for the standards.
|
Dr. Martin Pall Speaking on the Danger of 5G
|
Professor Martin Pall, says: Putting tens of millions of 5G antennae without a single biological test of safety has to be about the stupidist idea anyone has had in the history of the world. … Pulsed EMFs, EMFs which pulse up and down very rapidly, are in most cases much more biologically active than are non-pulsed EMFs. Every single wireless communication device communicates via pulsations but the industry completely ignores this issue. The problem with 5G is that they’re planning on putting out tens of millions of antennae all over the place without doing one single biological safety test. We are the guinea pigs.
|
LIST 1 - Advocates for Eugenics
1. Charles Darwin (his thinking is at the foundation of so many of our scientific theories today): “At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilised races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace throughout the world the savage races. At the same time the anthropomorphous apes, as Professor Schaaffhausen has remarked, will no doubt be exterminated. The break will then be rendered wider, for it will intervene between man in a more civilised state as we may hope, than the Caucasian and some ape as low as a baboon, instead of as at present between the negro or Australian and the gorilla.” 2. Bill Gates: “The problem is that the population is growing the fastest where people are less able to deal with it. So it’s in the very poorest places that you’re going to have a tripling in population by 2050. (…) And we’ve got to make sure that we help out with the tools now so that they don’t have an impossible situation later.” 3. Bernie Sanders: “In poor countries around the world where women do not necessarily want to have large numbers of babies, and where they can have the opportunity through birth control to control the number of kids they have, is something I very, very strongly support.” 4. UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson: “The primary challenge facing our species is the reproduction of our species itself…It is time we had a grown-up discussion about the optimum quantity of human beings in this country and on this planet…All the evidence shows that we can help reduce population growth, and world poverty, by promoting literacy and female emancipation and access to birth control.” 5. UK Television Presenter Sir David Attenborough: “The human population can no longer be allowed to grow in the same old uncontrolled way. If we do not take charge of our population size, then nature will do it for us.” 6. Paul Ehrlich, a former science adviser to president George W. Bush and the author of “The Population Bomb”: “Solving the population problem is not going to solve the problems of racism… of sexism… of religious intolerance… of war… of gross economic inequality. But if you don’t solve the population problem, you’re not going to solve any of those problems. Whatever problem you’re interested in, you’re not going to solve it unless you also solve the population problem.” 7. Dave Foreman, the co-founder of Earth First: “We humans have become a disease, the Humanpox.” 8. CNN Founder Ted Turner: “A total population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.” 9. Japan’s Deputy Prime Minister Taro Aso: about medical patients with serious illnesses: “You cannot sleep well when you think it’s all paid by the government. This won’t be solved unless you let them hurry up and die.” 10. David Rockefeller: “The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.” 11. Richard Branson: “The truth is this: the Earth cannot provide enough food and fresh water for 10 billion people, never mind homes, never mind roads, hospitals and schools.” 12. Environmental activist Roger Martin: “On a finite planet, the optimum population providing the best quality of life for all, is clearly much smaller than the maximum, permitting bare survival. The more we are, the less for each; fewer people mean better lives.” 13. HBO personality Bill Maher: “I’m pro-choice, I’m for assisted suicide, I’m for regular suicide, I’m for whatever gets the freeway moving – that’s what I’m for. It’s too crowded, the planet is too crowded and we need to promote death.” 14. Al Gore: “One of the things we could do about it is to change the technologies, to put out less of this pollution, to stabilize the population, and one of the principal ways of doing that is to empower and educate girls and women. You have to have ubiquitous availability of fertility management so women can choose how many children to have, the spacing of the children… You have to educate girls and empower women. And that’s the most powerful leveraging factor, and when that happens, then the population begins to stabilize and societies begin to make better choices and more balanced choices.” 15. MIT professor Penny Chisholm: “The real trick is, in terms of trying to level off at someplace lower than that 9 billion, is to get the birthrates in the developing countries to drop as fast as we can. And that will determine the level at which humans will level off on earth.” 16. Julia Whitty, a columnist for Mother Jones: “The only known solution to ecological overshoot is to decelerate our population growth faster than it’s decelerating now and eventually reverse it—at the same time we slow and eventually reverse the rate at which we consume the planet’s resources. Success in these twin endeavors will crack our most pressing global issues: climate change, food scarcity, water supplies, immigration, health care, biodiversity loss, even war. On one front, we’ve already made unprecedented strides, reducing global fertility from an average 4.92 children per woman in 1950 to 2.56 today—an accomplishment of trial and sometimes brutally coercive error, but also a result of one woman at a time making her individual choices. The speed of this childbearing revolution, swimming hard against biological programming, rates as perhaps our greatest collective feat to date.” 17. Colorado State University Professor Philip Cafaro in a paper entitled “Climate Ethics and Population Policy”: “Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for preventing catastrophic global climate change. Indeed, significantly reducing current human numbers may be necessary in order to do so.“ 18. Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka: “I have two grandchildren and I want them to inherit a stable Earth. But I fear for them. Humans have overpopulated the Earth and in the process have created an ideal nutritional substrate on which bacteria and viruses (microbes) will grow and prosper. We are behaving like bacteria growing on an agar plate, flourishing until natural limits are reached or until another microbe colonizes and takes over, using them as their resource. In addition to our extremely high population density, we are social and mobile, exactly the conditions that favor growth and spread of pathogenic (disease-causing) microbes. I believe it is only a matter of time until microbes once again assert control over our population, since we are unwilling to control it ourselves. This idea has been espoused by ecologists for at least four decades and is nothing new. People just don’t want to hear it.” 19. Kofi Annan, UN Secretary-General from 1997-2006: “The idea that population growth guarantees a better life — financially or otherwise — is a myth that only those who sell nappies, prams and the like have any right to believe.” 20. Thoraya Ahmed Obaid, UN Under-Secretary-General from 2000-2010: “We cannot confront the massive challenges of poverty, hunger, disease and environmental destruction unless we address issues of population and reproductive health.” 21. Bill Nye: “In 1750, there were about a billion humans in the world. Now, there are well over seven billion people in the world. It more than doubled in my lifetime. So all these people trying to live the way we live in the developed world is filling the atmosphere with a great deal more carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases than existed a couple of centuries ago. It’s the speed at which it is changing that is going to be troublesome for so many large populations of humans around the world.” 22. Actress Cameron Diaz: “I think women are afraid to say that they don’t want children because they’re going to get shunned. But I think that’s changing too now. I have more girlfriends who don’t have kids than those that do. And, honestly? We don’t need any more kids. We have plenty of people on this planet.” 23. Democrat strategist Steven Rattner: “WE need death panels. Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start allocating health care resources more prudently — rationing, by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.” 24. Matthew Yglesias, a business and economics correspondent for Slate, in an article entitled “The Case for Death Panels, in One Chart”: “But not only is this health care spending on the elderly the key issue in the federal budget, our disproportionate allocation of health care dollars to old people surely accounts for the remarkable lack of apparent cost effectiveness of the American health care system. When the patient is already over 80, the simple fact of the matter is that no amount of treatment is going to work miracles in terms of life expectancy or quality of life.” 25. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class” 26. Gloria Steinem: “Everybody with a womb doesn’t have to have a child any more than everybody with vocal chords has to be an opera singer.” 27. Jane Goodall: “It’s our population growth that underlies just about every single one of the problems that we’ve inflicted on the planet. If there were just a few of us, then the nasty things we do wouldn’t really matter and Mother Nature would take care of it — but there are so many of us.” 28. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” 29. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” 30. Salon columnist Mary Elizabeth Williams in an article entitled “So What If Abortion Ends Life?”: “All life is not equal. That’s a difficult thing for liberals like me to talk about, lest we wind up looking like death-panel-loving, kill-your-grandma-and-your-precious-baby storm troopers. Yet a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it resides.” |
LIST 2 - Advocates for Eugenics
1. UK Television Presenter Sir David Attenborough: “We are a plague on the Earth. It’s coming home to roost over the next 50 years or so. It’s not just climate change; it’s sheer space, places to grow food for this enormous horde. Either we limit our population growth or the natural world will do it for us, and the natural world is doing it for us right now” 2. Paul Ehrlich, a former science adviser to president George W. Bush and the author of “The Population Bomb”: “To our minds, the fundamental cure, reducing the scale of the human enterprise (including the size of the population) to keep its aggregate consumption within the carrying capacity of Earth is obvious but too much neglected or denied” 3. Paul Ehrlich again, this time on the size of families: “Nobody, in my view, has the right to have 12 children or even three unless the second pregnancy is twins” 4. Dave Foreman, the co-founder of Earth First: “We humans have become a disease, the Humanpox.” 5. CNN Founder Ted Turner: “A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal.” 6. Japan’s Deputy Prime Minister Taro Aso about medical patients with serious illnesses: “You cannot sleep well when you think it’s all paid by the government. This won’t be solved unless you let them hurry up and die.” 7. David Rockefeller: “The negative impact of population growth on all of our planetary ecosystems is becoming appallingly evident.” 8. Environmental activist Roger Martin: “On a finite planet, the optimum population providing the best quality of life for all, is clearly much smaller than the maximum, permitting bare survival. The more we are, the less for each; fewer people mean better lives.” 9. HBO personality Bill Maher: “I’m pro-choice, I’m for assisted suicide, I’m for regular suicide, I’m for whatever gets the freeway moving – that’s what I’m for. It’s too crowded, the planet is too crowded and we need to promote death.” 10. MIT professor Penny Chisholm: “The real trick is, in terms of trying to level off at someplace lower than that 9 billion, is to get the birthrates in the developing countries to drop as fast as we can. And that will determine the level at which humans will level off on earth.” 11. Julia Whitty, a columnist for Mother Jones: “The only known solution to ecological overshoot is to decelerate our population growth faster than it’s decelerating now and eventually reverse it—at the same time we slow and eventually reverse the rate at which we consume the planet’s resources. Success in these twin endeavors will crack our most pressing global issues: climate change, food scarcity, water supplies, immigration, health care, biodiversity loss, even war. On one front, we’ve already made unprecedented strides, reducing global fertility from an average 4.92 children per woman in 1950 to 2.56 today—an accomplishment of trial and sometimes brutally coercive error, but also a result of one woman at a time making her individual choices. The speed of this childbearing revolution, swimming hard against biological programming, rates as perhaps our greatest collective feat to date.” 12. Colorado State University Professor Philip Cafaro in a paper entitled “Climate Ethics and Population Policy”: “Ending human population growth is almost certainly a necessary (but not sufficient) condition for preventing catastrophic global climate change. Indeed, significantly reducing current human numbers may be necessary in order to do so.“ 13. Professor of Biology at the University of Texas at Austin Eric R. Pianka: “I do not bear any ill will toward people. However, I am convinced that the world, including all humanity, WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us.” 14. Detroit News Columnist Nolan Finley: “Since the national attention is on birth control, here’s my idea: If we want to fight poverty, reduce violent crime and bring down our embarrassing drop-out rate, we should swap contraceptives for fluoride in Michigan’s drinking water. We’ve got a baby problem in Michigan. Too many babies are born to immature parents who don’t have the skills to raise them, too many are delivered by poor women who can’t afford them, and too many are fathered by sorry layabouts who spread their seed like dandelions and then wander away from the consequences.” 15. John Guillebaud, professor of family planning at University College London: “The effect on the planet of having one child less is an order of magnitude greater than all these other things we might do, such as switching off lights. An extra child is the equivalent of a lot of flights across the planet.” 16. Democrat strategist Steven Rattner: “WE need death panels. Well, maybe not death panels, exactly, but unless we start allocating health care resources more prudently — rationing, by its proper name — the exploding cost of Medicare will swamp the federal budget.” 17. Matthew Yglesias, a business and economics correspondent for Slate, in an article entitled “The Case for Death Panels, in One Chart”: “But not only is this health care spending on the elderly the key issue in the federal budget, our disproportionate allocation of health care dollars to old people surely accounts for the remarkable lack of apparent cost effectiveness of the American health care system. When the patient is already over 80, the simple fact of the matter is that no amount of treatment is going to work miracles in terms of life expectancy or quality of life.” 18. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “All of our problems are the result of overbreeding among the working class” 19. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg: “Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of.” 20. Planned Parenthood Founder Margaret Sanger: “The most merciful thing that the large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it.” 21. Salon columnist Mary Elizabeth Williams in an article entitled “So What If Abortion Ends Life?”: “All life is not equal. That’s a difficult thing for liberals like me to talk about, lest we wind up looking like death-panel-loving, kill-your-grandma-and-your-precious-baby storm troopers. Yet a fetus can be a human life without having the same rights as the woman in whose body it resides.” 22. Alberto Giubilini of Monash University in Melbourne, Australia and Francesca Minerva of the University of Melbourne in a paper published in the Journal of Medical Ethics: “[W]hen circumstances occur after birth such that they would have justified abortion, what we call after-birth abortion should be permissible. … [W]e propose to call this practice ‘after-birth abortion’, rather than ‘infanticide,’ to emphasize that the moral status of the individual killed is comparable with that of a fetus … rather than to that of a child. Therefore, we claim that killing a newborn could be ethically permissible in all the circumstances where abortion would be. Such circumstances include cases where the newborn has the potential to have an (at least) acceptable life, but the well-being of the family is at risk.” 23. Nina Fedoroff, a key adviser to Hillary Clinton: “We need to continue to decrease the growth rate of the global population; the planet can’t support many more people.” 24. Barack Obama’s primary science adviser, John P. Holdren: “A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men. The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.” 25. David Brower, the first Executive Director of the Sierra Club: “Childbearing [should be] a punishable crime against society, unless the parents hold a government license … All potential parents [should be] required to use contraceptive chemicals, the government issuing antidotes to citizens chosen for childbearing.” 26. Thomas Ferguson, former official in the U.S. State Department Office of Population Affairs: “There is a single theme behind all our work–we must reduce population levels. Either governments do it our way, through nice clean methods, or they will get the kinds of mess that we have in El Salvador, or in Iran or in Beirut. Population is a political problem. Once population is out of control, it requires authoritarian government, even fascism, to reduce it…” 27. Mikhail Gorbachev: “We must speak more clearly about sexuality, contraception, about abortion, about values that control population, because the ecological crisis, in short, is the population crisis. Cut the population by 90% and there aren’t enough people left to do a great deal of ecological damage.” 28. Jacques Costeau: “In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it is just as bad not to say it.” 29. Finnish environmentalist Pentti Linkola: “If there were a button I could press, I would sacrifice myself without hesitating if it meant millions of people would die” 30. Prince Phillip, husband of Queen Elizabeth II and co-founder of the World Wildlife Fund: “In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation.” END OF LIST 2 Michael Snyder, 30 Population Control Quotes That Show That The Elite Truly Believe That Humans Are A Plague Upon The Earth, January 24, 2013, http://thetruthwins.com/archives/30-population-control-quotes-that-show-that-the-elite-truly-believe-that-humans-are-a-plague-upon-the-earth |
whos_behind_5g_cull_of_humanity.pdf | |
File Size: | 640 kb |
File Type: |
When I did my research I didn’t realize that there are more cell phones in the U.S. than the population, and you couldn’t have said that ten years ago. I also looked at the NIEHS site to see what was available and there was absolutely nothing. So this illness, which I think is incredibly important, this pollutant which I think is incredibly important is really being ignored by a lot of federal agencies in the U.S. and in Canada. In 2004 I attended a meeting of the World Health Organization. They had a special workshop on electro hypersensitivity and they said that EHS was a real and debilitating problem and it occurs at levels that are well below our guidelines. |
Dr. Magda Havas on the Dangers of 5G
|
Claire Edwards, former U.N. Editor, addressing the Secretary-General of the U.N., who appears to be clueless about the dangers of microwave radiation. In one of her videos she says that he has a degree in Electrical Engineering.
|
5G is potentially an annihilation event for this planet. It was marketed as 5G because it was intended for people to believe that it is just an upgrade from 4G but in fact if you understand wireless technology and cell phones you would know that cell phones were never tested for health and safety and wireless technology was never tested for health and safety … we know that all of this is absolutely devastating for health and the environment. 5G is going to be a very different technology … you can think of 4G as an antenna you might see in the distance – what 4G puts out is a soup. What 5G does is basically densification on every level. With a 5G box you have up to a thousand mini-antennas. What this produces is a beam. It’s like a laser and what goes out is a very concentrated signal and it does not attenuate over distance – it does not weaken over distance like a 4G signal does, therefore it maintains its power … 5G would be absolutely everywhere. Smart meters are a part of the rollout.
|
Just like cigarette smoke, excessive exposure to microwaves will cause cancer. It is only a matter of time and exposure. A growing number of people are contracting cancer of the brain, breast, testes and even rectum from keeping their cell phones too close to the body. This holds true throughout the socio-economic spectrum. If anything, those active people who can afford to purchase cell phones are the most likely to get cancer from using them. Tobacco products contain nicotine, which is highly addictive, but pulsating microwave signals will “entrain” the mind so that it becomes addicted to the electronic stimulation while at the same time dulling one’s awareness to the danger of continued exposure. In other words, the stimulation and entrainment is like an addictive drug -- one which diminishes mental capabilities over time. For quick confirmation of this phenomenon simply go to any mall or downtown area and observe the young people. More times than not most of them will be staring at their cell phone, oblivious to their surroundings. A few years ago there was a man who actually walked off a cliff while staring at his cell phone and fell to his death. Here is the story:
|
Compelling testimony from Cell Tower Technician on the dangers of 4G and 5G.
|
Those who pay attention to warnings such as this will be relatively small in number as the masses succumb to the worldwide web of propaganda pushing 4G and 5G. The bulk of tomorrow’s population is likely to be mentally ill (gone mad) and incapable of understanding the need for truth, ethics and freedom, much less removing themselves from the techno-tyranny being woven around them. It has been suggested by Dr. Dietrich Klinghardt, a German scientist, that microwave exposure disables the pineal gland, which is the “spiritual center” of the brain. Whether or not this is true, it is certainly thought provoking. This would explain the apparent decline in Christian morality and conscience in western society. It would explain why murder, mayhem and occult practices are on the rise. There seem to be more and more psychopaths living among us. Some of them are intelligent, well spoken and aggressive, rising high in the corporate and government bureaucracies. A psychopath would have no problem with a secret war, as long as he or she can profit from it.
|
Ex DHS employee reveals how microwave emitting airport scanners manufactured by Lockheed-Martin caused TSA agents to have severe health problems. Some employees got cancer and died from the exposure.
|
|
Sadly we live in a country that is a corporation. We have actors in the White House. They do not function on our behalf. It’s the same thing with local government and county governments. I know that many citizens go before city council meetings believing that their three minutes will activate a change. … We keep thinking that we can stop something that is on autopilot in every corporate agency across the United States. This is not only USA Inc., this is Earth Inc. Everyone else is in the same dilemma. It is absolute organized crime to the hilt and it is a massive eugenics, genocide program using methods beyond our wildest imaginations because we are good and decent people and we do not want to believe that they are intentionally killing us off … it truly is a secret weapon, a quiet war.
|
Not only did the 1996 Telecommunications Act fail to establish reasonable limits to microwave intensity but it also opened the door to monopolization of media by a handful of corporations. It did this by relaxing restrictions on how many television and radio stations could be acquired by one entity. Now there are only six media conglomerates controlling 90% of the “news” and "entertainment" (mind programming) that reaches the eyes and ears of Americans. This media monster works solely to protect corporate interests and to keep the people distracted from matters of great importance – such as their own survival. Top Fortune 500 corporations also work in tandem, toward the same general goals. This is because the same handful of mega-banks own 70% of the private stock of these corporations. These banks in turn are owned by dynasties that chart the general direction of these giant corporations by dictating which products are to be manufactured and which ones are put on the back burner, or which stories get news coverage and which stories get ignored. Any exposure of the dangers of microwave radiation is forbidden. With their vast financial resources and pyramidal structure of control the “elites” at the top of the pyramid can easily dispense marching orders down to the lower levels. Executives at each level are instructed not to reveal the dangers of microwave radiation because that would not be good for business. Since eugenics is an underlying motive, weaponized consumer technology has become a priority. The U.S. Federal Government is fully on board with this deployment. Industry has a way of controlling key players in politics.
|
The puppetmasters of the genocidal global order can’t help but rub their plan in our faces and their agenda been “hidden in plain sight” for a couple decades. Chiseled into the Georgia Guidestones (above), for example, is the rather stark statement in the form of a commandment, which reads: “maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.” This rather bland directive means that around 6.5 billion people will need to die so that the goal of shadowy “elites” may be realized. As far as they are concerned weaponized microwave technology is a better tool than conventional war because it can be waged in secret and thus is less prone to political opposition. Unlike conventional war the weapons can be deployed in every home, and the people will pay for them! Microwaves will reduce population in two chief ways: by the killing of sperm and eggs, which will dramatically reduce human reproduction, and by disease and sickness which will reduce life spans. 5G is going to be the most efficient and profitable killing machine every devised.
|
The dramatic drop in sperm counts from 1970 to 2010
can largely be blamed on microwave radiation. 5G is likely to make many men sterile. It a population reduction scheme. See downloadable article directly below. |
will_5g_cell_phone_technology_lead_to_population_reduction_as_large_numbers_of_men_become_sterile.pdf | |
File Size: | 537 kb |
File Type: |
|
|
The 2012-2017 Bioinitiative Report, which was done by independent scientists who were not paid by industry reveals that the FCC standard is millions of times too high. This means that ill effects of microwave radiation begin at a level millions of times lower than the level at which heat is produced in the body. This in turn means that every single cell tower, every single cell phone, and every single consumer device that emits microwave radiation is dangerous. If the FCC standard were set where it should be, industry profit would have been reduced by hundreds of billions of dollars. This is why publicized industry sponsored studies are always designed to underplay the effects of radiation. Those scientists employed by industry to do studies are dismissed if their results do not favor industry. Dr. Jerry L. Phillips, hired to do a study of the effects of microwave radiation, was dismissed when the results of his study proved unfavorable to Motorola. He speaks of it in this video:
|
Dr. Jerry L. Phillips
on his experience with Motorola |
Google Is Watching You, video exposé
|
These days it is becoming nearly impossible to purchase a new appliance, television or vehicle that is NOT outfitted with so-called “smart” technology. It is becoming more difficult to conduct business without computers or cellular phones. Any device designated as “smart” contains one or more microwave transmitters designed to communicate with the “smart” (microwave transmitting) electric meter attached to your home. The meter, it turns out, is perhaps the most dangerous device of all as it transmits severe microwave spikes which travel throughout the house wiring. According to Mark Steele, a weapons system expert from the UK, (website saveusnow.org.uk) the acronym S.M.A.R.T. stands for “Secret Militarized Armaments in Residential Technology”. If Mr. Steele is correct (and we believe that he is) the acronym reveals the underlying purpose of the technology.
|
In addition to being designed to sicken and kill you slowly with pulsating radiation “smart” devices are designed to “mine” data for the benefit of corporations in a process dubbed “surveillance capitalism”. The electric utility companies sell the data collected to corporations that use it to craft marketing strategies. The fact that these microwave emitting meters are unsafe cannot possibly be an “oversight”. If it were an “oversight” the meter manufacturers would recall unsafe devices, as do car manufacturers when it is found that a certain make and model was outfitted with a defective part. Rather than recall, the response to criticism from independent scientists, journalists and activists sounding the alarm is to deny, obfuscate, ignore or attack the messenger. Try going back to your old analog meter and see what kind of runaround you get. This indicates that the utility and microwave industries know exactly what they are doing, and the agenda is malicious. The only thing protecting industry from a flood of lawsuits is the outdated Herman Schwan safety standard, one which they fight tooth and nail to maintain with millions of dollars of advertising propaganda and political bribery.
|
Microwave Weapons Expert Mark Steele on
5G Weapon Systems and the Genocidal Agenda |
After watching the video on China's Dystopian Dictatorship consider how digital technology would bring fulfillment of biblical prophecy. The elimination of cash and the digitization of all transactions, as in high-tech Chinese cities, precludes hell on earth. In America, cash can still be used for transactions but it is fast becoming a thing of the past as the vast majority of transactions are now done electronically. Though it may be convenient to use credit and debit cards and cell phones for transactions it is also a trap. Once all transactions are fully digitized the state can track you through your money trail and can also withdraw funds from your account at will. It can freeze your assets should you become a “terrorist”, the definition of which expands with every advance of the tyranny. This dire scenario is the exact opposite of the joyful freedom and self-determination of early America.
|
Exposing China's Dystopian Dictatorship, video
|
will_5g_cell_phone_technology_lead_to_population_reduction_as_large_numbers_of_men_become_sterile.pdf | |
File Size: | 537 kb |
File Type: |